Add a debit or credit card to save time when you check out
Convenient and secure with 2 clicks. Add your card
Customers also search
Page 1 of 1Page 1 of 1
Compare with similar items
This Item  Fujifilm Neopan 100 Acros II Black and White Negative Film, 120 Roll Film |  |  |  |  |  | |
| Price | — | $21.99 | $149.99 | $95.45 | $139.99 | $19.86 |
| Delivery | — | Get it as soon as Friday, May 17 | Get it May 20 - 21 | Get it May 20 - 31 | — | Get it as soon as Friday, May 17 |
| Customer Ratings | ||||||
| Sold By | — | CONTINENTAL SUPPLY | CameraSpot | Amazon Japan | CameraSpot | MV Direct |
| roll quantity | 120 | 120 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| compatible devices | Camera | Camera | Camera | Camera | Camera | Camera |
| exposures per roll | 120 | — | — | 12 | 10 | 8 |
| film format type | 120 | — | instant | 120 | instant | 120 |
| film color type | Black and White | Black and White | black-and-white | Colored | black-and-white | Color |
| film lighting type | Daylight | — | Tungsten | Daylight | Tungsten | Daylight |
Reviews with images
You Gotta Love This Film
Fujifilm ACROS II 100 B&W produces a wide range of gray tonal values in film photography. It's really the standard by which other B&W films are measured. For a time Fujifilm stopped making ACROS, but now it's back. If you shoot B&W film you will want to shoot Fujifilm ACROS II 100 B&W.
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2021
Fujifilm ACROS II 100 B&W produces a wide range of gray tonal values in film photography. It's really the standard by which other B&W films are measured. For a time Fujifilm stopped making ACROS, but now it's back. If you shoot B&W film you will want to shoot Fujifilm ACROS II 100 B&W.
Images in this review
Reviewed in the United States on February 29, 2024
I've been shooting film for a number of years now. I shoot all formats of film; 35mm, 120 medium format, and most recently, 4x5 large format and I can confidently say that Fuji Acros is hands down the best B&W ISO100 film on the market, for my needs and style of photography, anyway. I find the slightly flatter, less contrasty negatives of Acros much easier to print with in the darkroom without the need for extensive use of contrast filters. They scan nicely and have a lot of shadow detail. I rarely have a problem with film curling. Usually they dry flat for easy scanning and darkroom printing, especially in 35mm format.
RECIPROCITY FAILURE: This film has a reciprocity failure of an astonishing 120 seconds. It blows away literally every other film in this regard. I don't know what the secret ingredient is that affords this film such a long reciprocity failure but I am not complaining. Not having to do math to compensate for long exposures for two whole minutes is a huge advantage, especially since I like doing long exposures of waterfalls.
GRAIN & SHARPNESS: When developed correctly in a developer that works well with this emulsion, this film will produce grain so fine it's almost impossible to see. I found Kodak TMax developer or Legacy Pro LMAX (TMax clone) to work especially well with this film because those developers are specifically designed to develop more modern T-grian films like Kodak TMax, Fuji Acros, and Ilford Delta. All my example images were developed at home using one of those two developers for 5.5 minutes at 68 degrees. As far as sharpness goes, it's extremely sharp. Assuming you have a good lens, you're focused accurately, and you don't have camera shake, this film will not disappoint in the sharpness category.
TONES: Acros is known to be a bit flatter than other films, and therefor produces a wider range of tones and has bags of shadow detail, yet I can still achieve deep black and crisp whites if I push or develop differently, though I've never seen a need to push this film. I think it looks best shot at box speed. I feel Acros handles highlights better than Kodak TMax, which is why I think it's better than Kodak. It's a little more forgiving.
WHO IS THIS FILM FOR? For the price and its characteristics, I think Acros sits firmly in the pro-hobbyist and above categories. Specifically, I think this film is particularly well suited for portraiture and landscapes. Photographers of those genres will find this film's smooth tonality, long reciprocity failure, very fine grain, and high sharpness appealing for their work. Street photographers will find the low ISO a bit of a setback and casual shooters will likely find the price unattractive.
To wrap up, I've shot many rolls of different film. Kodak TMax, Ilford Delta, FP4, HP5, and even some niche films here and there. When I have a serious photo in mind that I want to cross off my list, I reach for Acros without hesitation. I know it well, I know its characteristics and limitations, and I know I will get a very reliable, dependable negative to print from.
RECIPROCITY FAILURE: This film has a reciprocity failure of an astonishing 120 seconds. It blows away literally every other film in this regard. I don't know what the secret ingredient is that affords this film such a long reciprocity failure but I am not complaining. Not having to do math to compensate for long exposures for two whole minutes is a huge advantage, especially since I like doing long exposures of waterfalls.
GRAIN & SHARPNESS: When developed correctly in a developer that works well with this emulsion, this film will produce grain so fine it's almost impossible to see. I found Kodak TMax developer or Legacy Pro LMAX (TMax clone) to work especially well with this film because those developers are specifically designed to develop more modern T-grian films like Kodak TMax, Fuji Acros, and Ilford Delta. All my example images were developed at home using one of those two developers for 5.5 minutes at 68 degrees. As far as sharpness goes, it's extremely sharp. Assuming you have a good lens, you're focused accurately, and you don't have camera shake, this film will not disappoint in the sharpness category.
TONES: Acros is known to be a bit flatter than other films, and therefor produces a wider range of tones and has bags of shadow detail, yet I can still achieve deep black and crisp whites if I push or develop differently, though I've never seen a need to push this film. I think it looks best shot at box speed. I feel Acros handles highlights better than Kodak TMax, which is why I think it's better than Kodak. It's a little more forgiving.
WHO IS THIS FILM FOR? For the price and its characteristics, I think Acros sits firmly in the pro-hobbyist and above categories. Specifically, I think this film is particularly well suited for portraiture and landscapes. Photographers of those genres will find this film's smooth tonality, long reciprocity failure, very fine grain, and high sharpness appealing for their work. Street photographers will find the low ISO a bit of a setback and casual shooters will likely find the price unattractive.
To wrap up, I've shot many rolls of different film. Kodak TMax, Ilford Delta, FP4, HP5, and even some niche films here and there. When I have a serious photo in mind that I want to cross off my list, I reach for Acros without hesitation. I know it well, I know its characteristics and limitations, and I know I will get a very reliable, dependable negative to print from.
Images in this review
Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2021
Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2022
My film arrived with 4 months left until expiration. This stuff is way too expensive to be sending people expired film. This isn’t the first time Adorama has done this. Done buying from Adorama. Back to B&H I go
Images in this review
